咁貴個 MON, 只係用泥睇碟打機好似浪費左D WOR!! (+上又唔可以 FUUL SCREEN 點對點, 無 SO, 買 日本版 SHARP 32" /本地任何普通 37" FULL HD LCD TV 咪重好重抵重大......)
2560X1600 用泥做 GRAPHICS MON 先O岩!!
PS: IS GOOD
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者: 沒有註冊會員 和 6 位訪客
ACKK 寫:LCD Mon vs LCD TV, Big Difference...
You can always get a better display from Mon instead of TV(for the similar size)
What's the problem of using a graphic-editing monitor for entertainment?
The point is: The budjet is able to effort it.
Infact, it is not a 100% graphic-editing monitor.
This "graphic class" monitor is designed for entertainment use.
ACKK 寫:LCD Mon vs LCD TV, Big Difference...
You can always get a better display from Mon instead of TV(for the similar size)
What's the problem of using a graphic-editing monitor for entertainment?
The point is: The budjet is able to effort it.
Infact, it is not a 100% graphic-editing monitor.
This "graphic class" monitor is designed for entertainment use.
Oops 寫:ACKK 寫:LCD Mon vs LCD TV, Big Difference...
You can always get a better display from Mon instead of TV(for the similar size)
What's the problem of using a graphic-editing monitor for entertainment?
The point is: The budjet is able to effort it.
Infact, it is not a 100% graphic-editing monitor.
This "graphic class" monitor is designed for entertainment use.
The point is: 2560x1600 is not suitable for home-entertainment use.
For HD movie, pixel-to-pixel cannot be achieved in full screen. Hence, the image looks blurrier than 24" and 27" 1920x1200.
For gaming in pixel-to-pixel quality, I wonder that only 8800 Ultra @ SLI (maybe triple SLI) can do the work...
Despite of that, I've picked a 27" instead of 30". (If 30" has 1920x1200, I'd go for it)