beanbean and eddie
Really Professional
room accoustic is important, but... Wife Acceptance Factor is the most important (especially in a small house like mine )
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者: 沒有註冊會員 和 4 位訪客
Eddie Ngan 寫:
KY hing
My Arcam is AVP700+P1000
I used Japanese model before (Onkyo 701, Denon 3805), my experience for Japanese model is:
-Powerful
-Lot of function (actually, too much for me, I think I just use 70% of the function)
-Sounds are a bit artificial to me, not much musical
Then I would like to try try European/ US machine.
Now, the Arcam pre+power:
-Very musical (i campare it with Denon 3805 but others are the same, when listen Concert DVD.....D3805 can't comparel)
-Detail and analytical (When I watch DTS 9 and War of the world, I found I hear more detail that 3805 cannot provide)
-No exciting effect when compare to Denon 3805, but for me, it is more long lasting, my ear not easy get tired)
however, it also have some disadvantage:
-Not much function, only basic (no room eq, no auto calibration for speaker and sound level, video upscaling only support Component) but enough for me
-Not a tank built machine (light weight which may not accept by general when compare to Japanese machine)
Just my own experience, don't be serious
KY 寫:Eddie Ngan 寫:
KY hing
My Arcam is AVP700+P1000
I used Japanese model before (Onkyo 701, Denon 3805), my experience for Japanese model is:
-Powerful
-Lot of function (actually, too much for me, I think I just use 70% of the function)
-Sounds are a bit artificial to me, not much musical
Then I would like to try try European/ US machine.
Now, the Arcam pre+power:
-Very musical (i campare it with Denon 3805 but others are the same, when listen Concert DVD.....D3805 can't comparel)
-Detail and analytical (When I watch DTS 9 and War of the world, I found I hear more detail that 3805 cannot provide)
-No exciting effect when compare to Denon 3805, but for me, it is more long lasting, my ear not easy get tired)
however, it also have some disadvantage:
-Not much function, only basic (no room eq, no auto calibration for speaker and sound level, video upscaling only support Component) but enough for me
-Not a tank built machine (light weight which may not accept by general when compare to Japanese machine)
Just my own experience, don't be serious
thank you very much.
close to what i expected
小小Pat 寫:KY 寫:Eddie Ngan 寫:
KY hing
My Arcam is AVP700+P1000
I used Japanese model before (Onkyo 701, Denon 3805), my experience for Japanese model is:
-Powerful
-Lot of function (actually, too much for me, I think I just use 70% of the function)
-Sounds are a bit artificial to me, not much musical
Then I would like to try try European/ US machine.
Now, the Arcam pre+power:
-Very musical (i campare it with Denon 3805 but others are the same, when listen Concert DVD.....D3805 can't comparel)
-Detail and analytical (When I watch DTS 9 and War of the world, I found I hear more detail that 3805 cannot provide)
-No exciting effect when compare to Denon 3805, but for me, it is more long lasting, my ear not easy get tired)
however, it also have some disadvantage:
-Not much function, only basic (no room eq, no auto calibration for speaker and sound level, video upscaling only support Component) but enough for me
-Not a tank built machine (light weight which may not accept by general when compare to Japanese machine)
Just my own experience, don't be serious
thank you very much.
close to what i expected
諗惦未啊?
籃球迷 寫:luckybeanbean 寫:再 suck 滿隔熱吸音棉, 最緊要唔可以掂住最後放上去鮋板, 因為panel bass trap 鮋design 係靠其中一塊木板 (2分厚最好) 共震去將低頻轉做動能, 再靠箱入面鮋密封空氣將木板鮋動能轉做熱能, 再由隔熱棉去吸熱 去 間接化鰦低頻能量
麻煩借問聲吸音棉邊度有得賣同幾錢??謝謝!
Eddie Ngan 寫:籃球迷 寫:luckybeanbean 寫:再 suck 滿隔熱吸音棉, 最緊要唔可以掂住最後放上去鮋板, 因為panel bass trap 鮋design 係靠其中一塊木板 (2分厚最好) 共震去將低頻轉做動能, 再靠箱入面鮋密封空氣將木板鮋動能轉做熱能, 再由隔熱棉去吸熱 去 間接化鰦低頻能量
麻煩借問聲吸音棉邊度有得賣同幾錢??謝謝!
You can PM bean bean. He brought for me last time. Heard that should be around Mongkok and it just cost few hundred for a Roll of Fiber glass and 吸音棉O
籃球迷 寫:Eddie Ngan 寫:籃球迷 寫:luckybeanbean 寫:再 suck 滿隔熱吸音棉, 最緊要唔可以掂住最後放上去鮋板, 因為panel bass trap 鮋design 係靠其中一塊木板 (2分厚最好) 共震去將低頻轉做動能, 再靠箱入面鮋密封空氣將木板鮋動能轉做熱能, 再由隔熱棉去吸熱 去 間接化鰦低頻能量
麻煩借問聲吸音棉邊度有得賣同幾錢??謝謝!
You can PM bean bean. He brought for me last time. Heard that should be around Mongkok and it just cost few hundred for a Roll of Fiber glass and 吸音棉O
Sent PM already and thank you very much for your quick reply
luckybeanbean 寫:籃球迷 寫:Eddie Ngan 寫:籃球迷 寫:luckybeanbean 寫:再 suck 滿隔熱吸音棉, 最緊要唔可以掂住最後放上去鮋板, 因為panel bass trap 鮋design 係靠其中一塊木板 (2分厚最好) 共震去將低頻轉做動能, 再靠箱入面鮋密封空氣將木板鮋動能轉做熱能, 再由隔熱棉去吸熱 去 間接化鰦低頻能量
麻煩借問聲吸音棉邊度有得賣同幾錢??謝謝!
You can PM bean bean. He brought for me last time. Heard that should be around Mongkok and it just cost few hundred for a Roll of Fiber glass and 吸音棉O
Sent PM already and thank you very much for your quick reply
check pm