My photographic gears

發表人 **Outlaw Jack** 發表於 2005-05-09, 16:58

Body: FE2, F80, D70

Primes: MF 50/1.4, MF 105/2.5, AF 50/1.8, AF 60/2.8, AF 300/4, MF 400/3.5

Zoom: DX 12-24, AF 35-70/2.8, AF 80-200/2.8 (III)

Teleconverter: TC-301

Flash: SB 800

Want to acquire: Sigma 150/2.8 or Nikkor 200/4. Any suggestions?

發表人 **Outlaw Jack** 發表於 2005-05-09, 16:59

Outlaw Jack 寫:Body: FE2, F80, D70

Primes: MF 50/1.4, MF 105/2.5, AF 50/1.8, AF 60/2.8, AF 300/4, MF 400/3.5

Zoom: DX 12-24, AF 35-70/2.8, AF 80-200/2.8 (III)

Teleconverter: TC-301

Flash: SB 800

Want to acquire: Sigma 150/2.8 or Nikkor 200/4. Any suggestions?

Update on Teleconverter: TC-301 and Kenko 300 Pro 1.4X

發表人 **frankiemore** 發表於 2005-05-09, 19:22

Outlaw Jack 寫:
Outlaw Jack 寫:Body: FE2, F80, D70

Primes: MF 50/1.4, MF 105/2.5, AF 50/1.8, AF 60/2.8, AF 300/4, MF 400/3.5

Zoom: DX 12-24, AF 35-70/2.8, AF 80-200/2.8 (III)

Teleconverter: TC-301

Flash: SB 800

Want to acquire: Sigma 150/2.8 or Nikkor 200/4. Any suggestions?

Update on Teleconverter: TC-301 and Kenko 300 Pro 1.4X

AF 35-70/2.8,....這支鏡我最喜歡.....

發表人 **Outlaw Jack** 發表於 2005-05-10, 10:34

frankiemore 寫:
Outlaw Jack 寫:
Outlaw Jack 寫:Body: FE2, F80, D70

Primes: MF 50/1.4, MF 105/2.5, AF 50/1.8, AF 60/2.8, AF 300/4, MF 400/3.5

Zoom: DX 12-24, AF 35-70/2.8, AF 80-200/2.8 (III)

Teleconverter: TC-301

Flash: SB 800

Want to acquire: Sigma 150/2.8 or Nikkor 200/4. Any suggestions?

Update on Teleconverter: TC-301 and Kenko 300 Pro 1.4X

AF 35-70/2.8,....這支鏡我最喜歡.....

Yeah, me too; especially considering how reasonable it costs.

發表人 **goalkeeper** 發表於 2005-05-10, 11:11

35-70/2.8 is good, no doubt, but......................
:devil:

28-70/2.8 is better :ebsmile:

發表人 **Outlaw Jack** 發表於 2005-05-10, 11:35

goalkeeper 寫:35-70/2.8 is good, no doubt, but......................

28-70/2.8 is better

Agreed. But considering the cost and how cheap I am ... 35-70/2.8 suits me the best.

發表人 **peterso** 發表於 2005-05-10, 11:53

goalkeeper 寫:35-70/2.8 is good, no doubt, but......................

28-70/2.8 is better

D 色靚Ｄo架

發表人 **Outlaw Jack** 發表於 2005-05-10, 12:05

peterso 寫:
goalkeeper 寫:35-70/2.8 is good, no doubt, but......................

28-70/2.8 is better

D 色靚Ｄo架

Sure. But my wallet will be alot thinner! The pain will be too much to suffer for a cheapo like me.

發表人 **frankiemore** 發表於 2005-05-10, 12:59

Outlaw Jack 寫:
peterso 寫:
goalkeeper 寫:35-70/2.8 is good, no doubt, but......................

28-70/2.8 is better

D 色靚Ｄo架

Sure. But my wallet will be alot thinner! The pain will be too much to suffer for a cheapo like me.