cocacola99 寫:r32 寫: 睇嚟睇去, 如果大家有獨立DAC, 只有揀Majik;
但以呢個價位, 應該有好多其他選擇.
Exactly, unless u are a linn fans ir like it's outlook very much
如果是LINN FANS就不單喜歡佢的OUTLOOK啦. 如果有獨立DAC, WHY LINN? you can use PC/Mac.
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者: Google [Bot] 和 39 位訪客
cocacola99 寫:r32 寫: 睇嚟睇去, 如果大家有獨立DAC, 只有揀Majik;
但以呢個價位, 應該有好多其他選擇.
Exactly, unless u are a linn fans ir like it's outlook very much

brian_av100 寫:cocacola99 寫:r32 寫: 睇嚟睇去, 如果大家有獨立DAC, 只有揀Majik;
但以呢個價位, 應該有好多其他選擇.
Exactly, unless u are a linn fans ir like it's outlook very much
如果是LINN FANS就不單喜歡佢的OUTLOOK啦. 如果有獨立DAC, WHY LINN? you can use PC/Mac.


akiraku 寫: 如果有Linn ,仲會唔會keep住個CD transport ??




Raymond Wan 寫:akiraku 寫: 如果有Linn ,仲會唔會keep住個CD transport ??
![]()
![]()


akiraku 寫:固體蛇 寫: 當然明白一分錢一分貨o既道理, 但係majik同akurate內涵實在單薄得可憐
majik 和 akurate 的最大分別是否全鋁機箱,從而b後ackground 會靜D?
睇完內籠,Linn的賣點似乎係佢個power supply 同 noise shielding 度![]()




akiraku 寫:Raymond Wan 寫:akiraku 寫: 如果有Linn ,仲會唔會keep住個CD transport ??
![]()
![]()
why ? coz u use Mac to rip CD? why keep CD transport?






Raymond Wan 寫:akiraku 寫:Raymond Wan 寫:akiraku 寫: 如果有Linn ,仲會唔會keep住個CD transport ??
![]()
![]()
why ? coz u use Mac to rip CD? why keep CD transport?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Linn Akurate DS --> Linn DAC 聲,音樂感高
Mark Levinson No.31.5 + No.30.6 --> Mark Levinson DAC 聲,分析力強
![]()
![]()
![]()
Linn 與 Mark Levinson 的聲底及取向是稍有不同
![]()
![]()
故不會放棄 Mark Levinson
話晒都是 CD Reference System
![]()
![]()
用 CAS 是大勢所趨,高品質錄音 24Bit/192kHz FLAC 及方便
Akurate DS 是好的優質選擇
![]()
![]()


akiraku 寫:Raymond Wan 寫:akiraku 寫:Raymond Wan 寫:akiraku 寫: 如果有Linn ,仲會唔會keep住個CD transport ??
![]()
![]()
why ? coz u use Mac to rip CD? why keep CD transport?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Linn Akurate DS --> Linn DAC 聲,音樂感高
Mark Levinson No.31.5 + No.30.6 --> Mark Levinson DAC 聲,分析力強
![]()
![]()
![]()
Linn 與 Mark Levinson 的聲底及取向是稍有不同
![]()
![]()
故不會放棄 Mark Levinson
話晒都是 CD Reference System
![]()
![]()
用 CAS 是大勢所趨,高品質錄音 24Bit/192kHz FLAC 及方便
Akurate DS 是好的優質選擇
![]()
![]()
同意,Linn D 聲有其獨突之處,但我喜detail及大棚,當年放棄楝Linn,
Akurate是4者之best buy,如果佢有Linn的根本,會好吸引。
我話放棄transport意思是指一般用家的取態,我都有想過如果我用CAS(Linn或even stream mp3),會否再用cd 盤聽歌?我宜家正考慮買乜transport,呢個問題要思考一會![]()
![]()





Sai-Lo 寫: I've a very similar question 2 weeks ago and I've proposed one of the better solution in my mind-
P05 + majik -> D05 -> AMP
of course the cost is ~ $90K + $21K and this should come up with a total $120K solution (plus PC/IC)......I'm not willing to pay $120000 for source only as I'm poor
another possible solution, which I'd say is possible to replace the majik with a PC. which should be much cheaper.....though it makes simple things complicated.
On the other hand....if you really like Linn sound....then Akurate is a cheaper solution as it's only ~ $42K with reasonably good quality.....and you have nothing to lose (Provided you like Linn sound)
Even if you want a "back up" CD player you can easily get a X05 or second hand X03SE which should cost ~ $32K....and you can easily sell it if you eventually realise its......redundant.
to sum up the most important determining factor is whether you like Linn sound or not.




方法一較好, 除非您唔聽SACD.Sai-Lo 寫: I've a very similar question 2 weeks ago and I've proposed one of the better solution in my mind-
P05 + majik -> D05 -> AMP
of course the cost is ~ $90K + $21K and this should come up with a total $120K solution (plus PC/IC)......I'm not willing to pay $120000 for source only as I'm poor
another possible solution, which I'd say is possible to replace the majik with a PC. which should be much cheaper.....though it makes simple things complicated.
On the other hand....if you really like Linn sound....then Akurate is a cheaper solution as it's only ~ $42K with reasonably good quality.....and you have nothing to lose (Provided you like Linn sound)
Even if you want a "back up" CD player you can easily get a X05 or second hand X03SE which should cost ~ $32K....and you can easily sell it if you eventually realise its......redundant.
to sum up the most important determining factor is whether you like Linn sound or not.

